Normative Sentences and Evaluation Sensitivity

Authors

  • Justina Díaz Legaspe

Keywords:

disagreements, assessment, normativity, contextualism

Abstract

Our language is not merely descriptive: many of our daily expressions assess the entities that surround us, from predicates of taste to expressions like “interesting” or “funny”. Sentences containing them are assessment-sensitive: their truth-value depends on contextually salient evaluative standard, and their assertion gives raise to hard disagreements. This paper examines the extension of this category to sentences containing normative predicates and verbs (from ethic, epistemic, procedimental and deontologic discurses). Special attention is payed to the possibility of these sentences of issuing hard disagreements, in the frame of a theory that construes assertion in terms of the acquisition of discursive commitments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Justina Díaz Legaspe

Justina Díaz Legaspe es doctora por la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Actualmente se desempeña como profesora adjunta en la Universidad Nacional de La Plata y como investigadora de CONICET. Ha realizado estadías de investigación en la Universidad de Pittsburgh y en el Massachusetts Institute of Technology (EE. UU.). Sus temas de interés abarcan el debate entre contextualismo y relativismo semánticos, desacuerdos sin falta, lenguaje evaluativo y temas clásicos del área: teorías de la referencia, nombres propios, ficcionalismo y descripciones definidas. Se ha interesado también en áreas afines como filosofía de la mente, estética y metafísica.

Published

2017-05-30

How to Cite

Díaz Legaspe, J. (2017). Normative Sentences and Evaluation Sensitivity. Latin American Journal of Philosophy, 43(1), 29–47. Retrieved from https://rlfcif.org.ar/index.php/RLF/article/view/13

Issue

Section

Articles